Friday, September 29, 2006

Ugly Betty show provokes response from AAO


After watching and enjoying ABC's premiere of "Ugly Betty," the President of the American Association of Orthodontists (AAO) felt compelled to send the character a letter via the show's producers. Here is what he said:
Dear Betty, I saw you on Thursday and I want to be the first to congratulate you on joining the growing trend of more than one million adults with braces – you are well on your way to a healthy, beautiful smile.
Although most adults today opt for sleeker and less noticeable braces, it looks like you decided on the retro “railroad tracks” model. If you ever want to make a change, please feel free to contact me -- or one of my 9,350 colleagues in the U.S. and Canada -- at the American Association of Orthodontists. If you want to see the latest treatments we offer, or if you’d like to find an orthodontist near you, please visit us online at http://www.braces.org/.
Good luck with the new job and keep smiling, Donald R. Joondeph, DDS, MSPresidentAmerican Association of Orthodontists

Rachael Ray dish: The real-life Ugly Betty?

http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2006/09/bookers-to-rachel-we-hate-your-friends.php

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Canceled but not brilliant

First-week TV ratings for the season show no breakout hits yet (but "The Nine" and "Ugly Betty" haven't debuted yet) but few duds either. Unlike last year, which royally sucked in termed of new-show quality, this one has some strong offerings in terms of production values and execution, if not big names. But as we said in our season preview Sept. 14 (see nhregister.com), a few should exit quickly. One show we loathed, "Happy Hour," is already on hiatus. And I've only seen parts of "Smith," the Ray Liotta show, but I thought it was pretty bad. Also earning an early hook: The Game on CW and probably "Men in Trees" on ABC, which has some moments but can't get past the fact its Anne Heche in Alaska and we already saw "Northern Exposure."
I respect your views, so send in your input. "Smith"? "Til Death?" "Brothers & Sisters"

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Madonna must go.

Brent Bozell of The Parents Television Council says NBC is being hostile to Christians.
“Now NBC is planning to air a concert special featuring Madonna on the Cross, wearing a crown of thorns. This is Madonna doing her utmost to deliberately insult the Christian faith. Incredibly NBC executive Kevin Reilly has gone on the record to state NBC’s position on this bigotry: ‘We viewed it and didn’t see it as being inappropriate,'" he said.
“What he is saying, loudly and unequivocally, is that NBC’s official position is that it is appropriate to insult Christians. This attitude toward Christianity is inexcusable. It’s also a shocking double standard.
“In February of this year, NBC Nightly News chose not to show the cartoons that so offended the Muslim community. On February 7, Allison Gollust, an NBC spokeswoman, was quoted saying, ‘We felt that in order to convey the essence of the story it was not necessary to show the entire cartoon.’"
Bozell and the Catholic League's William Donohue make the same point: We can't offend Muslims because they're quick to riot. But it's OK to offend Christians.
That's partly because Christians have more tolerance. And please don't refer back to the Middle Ages because we'd like to think we've progessed since then.
It does make you wonder about NBC's Standards and Practices unit, which should have put the clamps on trampy, money-grubbing Madonna right away. It's broacast TV, and these are still public airwaves.

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

Monorail! It's not just a 'Simpsons' sketch

Four years ago I wrote a column about how our roads are screwed up but we will never get away from the automobile since the economy is all wrapped up in the car. I suggested we sink money into monorails, which are (in a word) cool. Sunday in the Register I may write more on this concept. The following is my original column. Please send me your ideas on this:

Ride the rail north — into 'Autoford'
Joe Amarante
05/05/2002

News items: April car sales were up; New Haven's mayor says the city is being shortchanged on state funds for major road reconstruction; another SUV rolls over in a terrible accident.
So much of American life is tied up in the automobile. It has led to economic expansion, suburban culture (white flight, too), environmental pollution and so much more. But is it possible to imagine a modern world with less of a reliance on cars?
Whoa, you say, where would people smoke cigarettes in tiny enclosed spaces? Where would unmarried people make out? How would you show fellow townsfolk that you make more money?People who take the bus already spend little of their lives in a car, but buses haven't changed much in our lifetimes. They're noisy, pollute the air and rattle as they hit nearly every storm drain along the main road. Trains? Light rail? Bicycles? Nice idea; now move to China.In a column last summer, I suggested we make New Haven special by constructing, among other things like fountains, a monorail in the city. People responded to this column by urging more resources be spent on open space, the local airport and arts institutions (all worthy), but I'm not hearing much about the monorail.Well it turns out there is a Monorail Society, with 2,100 members in 64 countries, (now 4,800 in 83 countries) promoting the concept of monorails. "Monorails are not just for theme parks and zoos!" reads the Web site, www.monorails.org Nor are they just for "Music Man" takeoffs on "The Simpsons" (very funny nonetheless).The Tokyo monorail is operated by a private business and turns a profit each year, says the monorail backers. The "graceful arched guideway" at Walt Disney World features a beam that is only 26 inches wide and leaves a small shadow on the ground. (Some of us could stand to cast a smaller shadow.)So a monorail is aesthetically nicer than a heavy rail or light rail solution to transit problems. Subways are a monster public works project, but a monorail can be installed by digging a hole, dropping in a pre-built support pylon, attaching track that is built off-site and attaching the cars, which operate at a 99.9 percent reliability, say backers.Rubber tires contact the guideway and last some 100,000 miles. Other systems, called maglev for magnetic levitation, are also worth considering (although they require a thicker track).I tried to imagine a monorail originating in downtown New Haven and stretching out into the suburbs to other Connecticut cities. I drove up Route 5 the other day with an eye for this.OK, overhead wires and stoplights would be a problem, for sure. But the city would be a great location for the quiet and sleek monorail. There are successful monorails in Seattle and Las Vegas right now, for instance.On Route 5 in North Haven, the land is relatively open and flat as you head out past the used-car garages, the credit union office, the auto stereo installer, the auto parts store, Acme Auto and the Acura-BMW-Mercedes dealership.You go out past the outdoor billboard for the VW dealership, the Daewoo-Porsche-Audi place, the "special metals" factory and you're in Wallingford.Ah, Wallingord, home of Little League giants and acres of gleaming glass and steel along Route 5. They should call it Autoford.There you'll see an auto-detailing business, some used-car lots, Cytec (motto: It's not soylent green), the Chevy-Isuzu dealer, the Pontiac-Kia-Nissan dealer, the Subaru dealer, the Mitsubishi dealer, the Mercury-Lincoln dealer and (as you approach Meriden) the Hyundai and Honda dealers.At the Toyota dealer on Route 5, where I spent an hour or two last week, the place looks like an amusement park compared to the corner repair shop. Doughnuts in the waiting room, a playscape for young children, a parts store that looks more like a gift shop.The place was buzzing with salespeople, service people (one guy makes sure your car is washed after it's serviced), finance people and support staff. The newspaper in the waiting area makes money from car advertising, and the town government a few miles away runs partly on the property taxes the cars sold outside will generate. A few of those cars cost nearly as much as my house did in 1979.Just off Route 5 are the "auto salvage" yards that deal in "used parts." There are auto body shops, car washes and (of course) lawyers who specialize in suits resulting from car accidents. My insurance agent's office is there, too.You get the point. We're all in this too deep to give up our car-crazy way of life. Cars are more than just a symbol of our rugged American individualism; they are stitched into the fabric of our lives and livelihoods so thoroughly that if all gasoline disappeared tomorrow, we'd have a new fuel in place by next week.Monorail and light-rail systems require a great commitment of resources and sacrifice — something the average auto driver will never stand (or sit) for.
Contact Joe Amarante at (203) 789-5675 or jamarante@ctcentral.com

Monday, September 18, 2006

"Holy War" is an offensive oxymoron

Let me see if I have this right: The Pope, in a long discourse that involved historical themes, offends Muslims by (according to them) implying they use violence to impose their way. So a few of them go out and shoot a defensiveless nun. How dare the Pope insinuate that Islam has a violently radical element! Here's the deal: If any religion pushes violence, under any circumstance except defending yourself from an ongoing attack, then it's showing a nasty human side that has nothing to do with God or Allah or whatever you want to call him.

Thursday, September 14, 2006

Everyone Has a TV Show

How vast is TV's reach in the modern age? Just a tiny example: The DIY network (which I don't have and I don't know of anyone who does have it) has shows called "Stylelicious," "Get Framed," "Creative Juice," "Embellish This!" and "From Junky to Funky." I think the few of us in this world who don't have TV shows should probably consider ourselves to be failures. Or lucky. Mine would be a business show called "Synergize This!"

Saturday, September 09, 2006

9/11/2001

That day, I was talking to my lovely wife about ordinary stuff at my house, before heading off to work. It was her day off, I think. I pulled out of the driveway, put on WCBS-88 in New York and heard the anchor say that the second tower of the WTC had been hit and was collapsing -- apparently the work of terrorists. I turned around and screeched into my driveway, ran in and angrily told my wife, "The bastards have knocked down the World Trade Center!" I put the TV on, watched more than an hour and then ran off to work, having taken some notes on coverage. I wrote a story in work about the TV coverage that made a special afternoon edition the Register put out. For my son, it was he who noticed the towers on fire while glancing at a TV in the gym locker room. It was his favorite building, one he'd visited on a class trip. For my daughter Cathy, it was her first week of classes in suburban New York and the college's phone system would go down (it had a satellite location a couple of blocks from the WTC in New York City). For my daughter Tina, her 9/11 birthday would be henceforth known as a day of infamy. The next day I called my old friend Mike R., a CFO in lower Manhattan who watched the towers fall and fled north on foot to find a train back to Connecticut. The world changed that day, and we're still trying to assess blame and figure out our nation's reaction in 2006, judging by the debate over the miniseries on ABC Sunday, "The Path to 9/11." I wrote a positive review, but I'm for ABC editing out anything they fictionalized if it puts unverified dialogue in the mouth of a real person. We all know Clinton and minions could have done more; we all know George W. Bush and the neocons wrecked all the sympathy and good will America had in those days by invading Iraq and getting stuck in a quagmire there. I just think the show was well done and, yes, informative.